Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Monday, April 19, 2010
Drag Me To Hell (copied directly from IMDB)
Ok, I made a promise I would just watch the movie and not analyze the crap out of it, but lots of thoughts stream to my head. Here goes:
I haven't payed attention, I don't really know what most people like about it, but I think the aspect that seems to get discussed least of its dues is the aspect I loved the most: Christine Brown. She's simply one of the my all-time favorite characters.
I love that you can interpret that Christine is supposed to be an exemplar of someone destined to go to hell for all of the things she did. She is everything in the name of completely and utterly selfish. That payment extension she threw back in the old lady's face.... just to earn her promotion. It came right after her manager mentioned how the new guy was "more aggressive." It went to her head right away, if just so she can show off her best possible attempt at aggression. More aspects of her selfishness. Slaughters a cat, almost sends her co-worker to hell. And during the seance, in an attempt to save herself.... "it was my manager! it was my manager!"
I loved all of the Christine Brown character traits, she was probably a great chunk of the movie for me. And the fact that she seems to have a short fuse for anything that tests her patience. She blows her load in the face of a waiter, and anybody that slightly annoys her. "I have a lot on my mind, can we do this tomorrow?" I think Raimi has a slight and odd infatuation, or just a very obsessive dislike of hateful female characters. I think Christine Brown might be a criticism of real life female personalities he seems to take issues with. Maybe, just maybe.
And, one extra thing that DOESN'T drag the movie down..... is that her boyfriend wasn't a completely useless character. He seems to be the caring figure of Christine's well being. Like her blanket of security, and I think his character was specifically necessary when the audience feels the scent of sympathy for her. In other words, the audience roots for Christine, they don't want anything to happen to her, and her boyfriend's loyal care of her fiancee makes the audience feels secure for Christine's well being. I've seen movies where the beloved is nothing more than a reason for film's sake. This case, the audience feels a sense of safeness that Christine is safe, through the character traits of her boyfriend.
To nitpick, I'd say the only thing I didn't particularly like was the hallucinations. I think the film occasionally flaunts images of blood and guts. They aren't really that big of a deal, I don't really think they're really any use, still not that big of a deal, if maybe just to remind us every 10 minutes that the film is a horror film. Specifically speaking, the scenes where you have a supernatural figure pop up and deliver one line of dialogue "you will go to hell, you will go to hell."
I guess the point I'm trying to make is that I didn't really care much for the film's continuity between sane world and supernatural world, it seems like a slightly off sync combination. But that's really a light quibble, the characters are perfect. The lead cannot be anymore fun to watch: character and performance.
Not to say the horror aspects aren't all fine, but I honestly think the characters are most of the fun. Horror films generally, two things: 1. designed so you barely notice the characters. Which isn't a bad thing, to say, if the film lets the genre aspects do all of the work. A horror film can survive as just the perfect horror form. 2) you have memorable characters balanced with all of the wall-to-wall insanity that accompanies the genre aspects.
Anyways, I wanted to see this again to make sure I haven't showered too much initial love for it, and I haven't. It got even better, and it's definitely something that will now make its nest in my DVD collection. It reminds me of From Dusk Till Dawn. Just that all out, zany indulgence, and this addictive arcade zone you want to live in. When the movie is over, "ah *beep*, reality" Like the feeling you get when you have to finally turn off your video game for the night.
Ok, I really really love this movie. Everything put together, of 2009 movies, it kept my attention the most, it was the most engaging movie I saw. Or maybe I'll be a smartass and say it's one of the only 4 movies of the year that even kept my attention. But that taken into account or not taken into account, this has a safe and permenant spot in my top 30 favorites of all time.
I haven't payed attention, I don't really know what most people like about it, but I think the aspect that seems to get discussed least of its dues is the aspect I loved the most: Christine Brown. She's simply one of the my all-time favorite characters.
I love that you can interpret that Christine is supposed to be an exemplar of someone destined to go to hell for all of the things she did. She is everything in the name of completely and utterly selfish. That payment extension she threw back in the old lady's face.... just to earn her promotion. It came right after her manager mentioned how the new guy was "more aggressive." It went to her head right away, if just so she can show off her best possible attempt at aggression. More aspects of her selfishness. Slaughters a cat, almost sends her co-worker to hell. And during the seance, in an attempt to save herself.... "it was my manager! it was my manager!"
I loved all of the Christine Brown character traits, she was probably a great chunk of the movie for me. And the fact that she seems to have a short fuse for anything that tests her patience. She blows her load in the face of a waiter, and anybody that slightly annoys her. "I have a lot on my mind, can we do this tomorrow?" I think Raimi has a slight and odd infatuation, or just a very obsessive dislike of hateful female characters. I think Christine Brown might be a criticism of real life female personalities he seems to take issues with. Maybe, just maybe.
And, one extra thing that DOESN'T drag the movie down..... is that her boyfriend wasn't a completely useless character. He seems to be the caring figure of Christine's well being. Like her blanket of security, and I think his character was specifically necessary when the audience feels the scent of sympathy for her. In other words, the audience roots for Christine, they don't want anything to happen to her, and her boyfriend's loyal care of her fiancee makes the audience feels secure for Christine's well being. I've seen movies where the beloved is nothing more than a reason for film's sake. This case, the audience feels a sense of safeness that Christine is safe, through the character traits of her boyfriend.
To nitpick, I'd say the only thing I didn't particularly like was the hallucinations. I think the film occasionally flaunts images of blood and guts. They aren't really that big of a deal, I don't really think they're really any use, still not that big of a deal, if maybe just to remind us every 10 minutes that the film is a horror film. Specifically speaking, the scenes where you have a supernatural figure pop up and deliver one line of dialogue "you will go to hell, you will go to hell."
I guess the point I'm trying to make is that I didn't really care much for the film's continuity between sane world and supernatural world, it seems like a slightly off sync combination. But that's really a light quibble, the characters are perfect. The lead cannot be anymore fun to watch: character and performance.
Not to say the horror aspects aren't all fine, but I honestly think the characters are most of the fun. Horror films generally, two things: 1. designed so you barely notice the characters. Which isn't a bad thing, to say, if the film lets the genre aspects do all of the work. A horror film can survive as just the perfect horror form. 2) you have memorable characters balanced with all of the wall-to-wall insanity that accompanies the genre aspects.
Anyways, I wanted to see this again to make sure I haven't showered too much initial love for it, and I haven't. It got even better, and it's definitely something that will now make its nest in my DVD collection. It reminds me of From Dusk Till Dawn. Just that all out, zany indulgence, and this addictive arcade zone you want to live in. When the movie is over, "ah *beep*, reality" Like the feeling you get when you have to finally turn off your video game for the night.
Ok, I really really love this movie. Everything put together, of 2009 movies, it kept my attention the most, it was the most engaging movie I saw. Or maybe I'll be a smartass and say it's one of the only 4 movies of the year that even kept my attention. But that taken into account or not taken into account, this has a safe and permenant spot in my top 30 favorites of all time.
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Friday, April 09, 2010
Thursday, March 25, 2010
.jpg)
Monday, March 15, 2010
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
Monday, September 28, 2009
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Wednesday, September 09, 2009
Saturday, September 05, 2009
Tuesday, September 01, 2009
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
(500) Days of Summer.... (directly copied from imdb)
To guide everyone through my thought process BEFORE my going to see (500) Days of Summer, I was expecting a half-whimsical styled film featuring tons of either very fast flash-to-flash, all-in-an-instant editing similar to Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind or a kinetic, music and motion creates feeling, style similiar to Marie Antoinette. Because... you can't expect a film like this to have been done completely still. But, the film hardly came close to outdoing or even matching the styles of either. The film's major setting is essentially the inside of an apartment. Except some scenes, I would say that if you didn't completely take in those scenes inside the apartment, the film falls flat, period. Which leads to my next point... about how the hundreds of shots of the couple inside their abode is really given no extra help from the camera, because the shots just really sat there and really didn't do much of anything in terms of being stylistically exciting.
Which is why Michel Gondry made Eternal Sunshine seem like a montage every single time during a less-than-100 percent-completely-exciting scene (like scenes in an apartment), because what if he doesn't make it appear like this quick spree of all-at-once combination of shots.... the film would hardly be the picture perfect, blast of montage images that has been implanted into everyone's minds. I find it hard to describe how I felt about the stylistic aspect of (500) Days of Summer... it just felt blegh and like a pretty feeble attempt at creating the perfect sensual delight. But don't be confused! Don't go in expecting a film where the camera completely zeroes in, because it's hardly that. Most of the shots are a minute to two minutes long, but then it moves on to the next sequence of events when it gets done with "one day of summer."
It took me a while before I finally got situated, and realized that it's less "sensual" and more "quirky." So my conversion from expectations to reality (as detailed in one of the scenes) was to be specific, kind of like how JGL felt when he stormed out of the room at the moment of Zooey's engagement. All of that is not really a bad thing, I’m just detailing how I felt and it took me a while before I played along and finally got used to it. The playhouse narrations does almost nothing, except maybe chime in once every 30 minutes with maybe two lines of extra enlightenment. That is really just hitting the surface, the gimmicks have absolutely no end. The clumsy jokes which find humor in the awkward moments of their relationship can be found in every turn and angle. There are just so many things that scream "awkward." I don't understand how the musical scene featuring JGL dancing on the streets with a set of other people and an animated little blue bird really helps to heighten any aspect of the film. Because other than make the film appear like a weird, completely different movie, everything about it just screamed "extraneous" out loud, and "distracting" even louder. In fact, at the very end when JGL finds himself his "Autumn," the only thing that I felt like expressing that was on the edge of my tongue was "har har har?" Because what really does the gimmick of telling us that his next girlfriend's name is Autumn supposed to do? Other than break the momentum of a pretty good confrontation scene between JGL and Zooey, it's just entirely a nuisance, especially when I was still lingering in the after effect of JGL and Zooey’s break-up right before that scene.
The reason I state this is that.... a few pretty funny jokes might be immediately funny, but the second time you see it, it's hard to chuckle as loud. Do I mind it? Of course I do, otherwise I wouldn't have mentioned it. But then, on the other side of the coin, the second time I see it, I might mind it a little less because it would have been what I was expecting and could be easier to ignore. But, that being said, how funny was that scene of Zooey pretending to have not heard JGL's friend's exposition on JGL’s true feelings about Zooey? "Stalking, sorry….. starting."
In fact, the only scene (maybe a few scenes, come to think of it) in which I felt genuine affection toward the couple happened in a scene that didn't have in abundance any of the things I mentioned in the previous two paragraphs or any annoying indie music. It was the scene where JGL declares he needs some sort of "guarantee" that Zooey won't just wake up in the morning feeling differently. It is one of the best scenes in the film; JGL's vulnerability and Zooey's openness left genuine human emotions lingering around. The expectations/reality scene was also very effective, if for some of the same reasons. The more human moments between the characters I liked much more than the scenes of them screaming "penis, penis" on a park bench.
Zooey Deschanel's quiet fragility strikes a few similarities to her performance in All the Real Girls, but it's actually two pieces of something very-much-its-own. The appeal of Zooey's beautiful harmony is entirely her soft and fragile voice. Her mellow tranquility is the perfect companion to the quiet poetry of Gordon Green's All the Real Girls. Her slightly more "light" character here is shades of adorable, but different shades of human, and even more shades of vulnerable. Nobody else could have played this role. She is a built in archetype of the traits I mentioned and she should, in all seriousness, be typecast in this vein. I wouldn't speak of another actress in the same way, because I seriously can't. I wouldn't even describe any of my favorites in the same vein.
I am most certainly not trying to rebel against a popular Oscar Buzz favorite. Neither am I trying to sent anybody into a state of frenzy, (sorry Mitch) but these are my thoughts. It's a movie I expected to love, but I am neither disappointed nor do I care how popular this movie becomes. I can understand the appeal. A film that’s designed to be about a relationship's ups-and-downs is appealing to people in many ways than I can understand. Because the film reads off like a cinematic diary, a diary about a relationship, and lord knows, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind made it pretty obvious that people love movies like that.
In my very own opinion, but maybe influenced a little by my judgment of the final reaction of the people I saw this with, (who mainly responded to this film with all laughs and satisfaction), this movie is everything in the name of immediate. It does what it should do, it charms, it entertains, I don't know how much of an endlessly rewatchable favorite this could become, but as of this moment, even if I'm not a fan of Eternal Sunshine, it felt a lot better than this did. If I compare (500) Days of Summer to one of my favorites, it does not come close. I’m not suggesting that this film should be any specific film, but if you’re expecting the perfect vehicle of a bliss romance or the next “major” staple of a modern classic of this decade (Lost in Translation, Eternal Sunshine), or a sensual masterpiece, those statements would be in the name of hyperbole. What can you say? If it tries to be an immediately charming, cute-a-thon, it works. If it tries to go to the next level, it just falls short. I just don’t find it sensually sweeping enough, in my best opinion. It’s not a bad thing, but no one would say Bugsy is better than The Godfather.
If you don’t feel like reading of all that, well then….. I’ll say that I find this to be really good, but nothing more than just something coated with a handful of charm.
Which is why Michel Gondry made Eternal Sunshine seem like a montage every single time during a less-than-100 percent-completely-exciting scene (like scenes in an apartment), because what if he doesn't make it appear like this quick spree of all-at-once combination of shots.... the film would hardly be the picture perfect, blast of montage images that has been implanted into everyone's minds. I find it hard to describe how I felt about the stylistic aspect of (500) Days of Summer... it just felt blegh and like a pretty feeble attempt at creating the perfect sensual delight. But don't be confused! Don't go in expecting a film where the camera completely zeroes in, because it's hardly that. Most of the shots are a minute to two minutes long, but then it moves on to the next sequence of events when it gets done with "one day of summer."
It took me a while before I finally got situated, and realized that it's less "sensual" and more "quirky." So my conversion from expectations to reality (as detailed in one of the scenes) was to be specific, kind of like how JGL felt when he stormed out of the room at the moment of Zooey's engagement. All of that is not really a bad thing, I’m just detailing how I felt and it took me a while before I played along and finally got used to it. The playhouse narrations does almost nothing, except maybe chime in once every 30 minutes with maybe two lines of extra enlightenment. That is really just hitting the surface, the gimmicks have absolutely no end. The clumsy jokes which find humor in the awkward moments of their relationship can be found in every turn and angle. There are just so many things that scream "awkward." I don't understand how the musical scene featuring JGL dancing on the streets with a set of other people and an animated little blue bird really helps to heighten any aspect of the film. Because other than make the film appear like a weird, completely different movie, everything about it just screamed "extraneous" out loud, and "distracting" even louder. In fact, at the very end when JGL finds himself his "Autumn," the only thing that I felt like expressing that was on the edge of my tongue was "har har har?" Because what really does the gimmick of telling us that his next girlfriend's name is Autumn supposed to do? Other than break the momentum of a pretty good confrontation scene between JGL and Zooey, it's just entirely a nuisance, especially when I was still lingering in the after effect of JGL and Zooey’s break-up right before that scene.
The reason I state this is that.... a few pretty funny jokes might be immediately funny, but the second time you see it, it's hard to chuckle as loud. Do I mind it? Of course I do, otherwise I wouldn't have mentioned it. But then, on the other side of the coin, the second time I see it, I might mind it a little less because it would have been what I was expecting and could be easier to ignore. But, that being said, how funny was that scene of Zooey pretending to have not heard JGL's friend's exposition on JGL’s true feelings about Zooey? "Stalking, sorry….. starting."
In fact, the only scene (maybe a few scenes, come to think of it) in which I felt genuine affection toward the couple happened in a scene that didn't have in abundance any of the things I mentioned in the previous two paragraphs or any annoying indie music. It was the scene where JGL declares he needs some sort of "guarantee" that Zooey won't just wake up in the morning feeling differently. It is one of the best scenes in the film; JGL's vulnerability and Zooey's openness left genuine human emotions lingering around. The expectations/reality scene was also very effective, if for some of the same reasons. The more human moments between the characters I liked much more than the scenes of them screaming "penis, penis" on a park bench.
Zooey Deschanel's quiet fragility strikes a few similarities to her performance in All the Real Girls, but it's actually two pieces of something very-much-its-own. The appeal of Zooey's beautiful harmony is entirely her soft and fragile voice. Her mellow tranquility is the perfect companion to the quiet poetry of Gordon Green's All the Real Girls. Her slightly more "light" character here is shades of adorable, but different shades of human, and even more shades of vulnerable. Nobody else could have played this role. She is a built in archetype of the traits I mentioned and she should, in all seriousness, be typecast in this vein. I wouldn't speak of another actress in the same way, because I seriously can't. I wouldn't even describe any of my favorites in the same vein.
I am most certainly not trying to rebel against a popular Oscar Buzz favorite. Neither am I trying to sent anybody into a state of frenzy, (sorry Mitch) but these are my thoughts. It's a movie I expected to love, but I am neither disappointed nor do I care how popular this movie becomes. I can understand the appeal. A film that’s designed to be about a relationship's ups-and-downs is appealing to people in many ways than I can understand. Because the film reads off like a cinematic diary, a diary about a relationship, and lord knows, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind made it pretty obvious that people love movies like that.
In my very own opinion, but maybe influenced a little by my judgment of the final reaction of the people I saw this with, (who mainly responded to this film with all laughs and satisfaction), this movie is everything in the name of immediate. It does what it should do, it charms, it entertains, I don't know how much of an endlessly rewatchable favorite this could become, but as of this moment, even if I'm not a fan of Eternal Sunshine, it felt a lot better than this did. If I compare (500) Days of Summer to one of my favorites, it does not come close. I’m not suggesting that this film should be any specific film, but if you’re expecting the perfect vehicle of a bliss romance or the next “major” staple of a modern classic of this decade (Lost in Translation, Eternal Sunshine), or a sensual masterpiece, those statements would be in the name of hyperbole. What can you say? If it tries to be an immediately charming, cute-a-thon, it works. If it tries to go to the next level, it just falls short. I just don’t find it sensually sweeping enough, in my best opinion. It’s not a bad thing, but no one would say Bugsy is better than The Godfather.
If you don’t feel like reading of all that, well then….. I’ll say that I find this to be really good, but nothing more than just something coated with a handful of charm.
Friday, July 03, 2009
Lead Actress Lineup of the 50s
"as for those things, that act as markers in your life, but in between, you can't remember"
1950
1. GLORIA SWANSON for SUNSET BLVD.
2. ELEANOR PARKER for CAGED
3. BETTE DAVIS for ALL ABOUT EVE
4. ANNE BAXTER for ALL ABOUT EVE
5. JUDY HOLLIDAY for BORN YESTERDAY
1951
1. ELEANOR PARKER for DETECTIVE STORY
2. SHELLEY WINTERS for A PLACE IN THE SUN
3. VIVIEN LEIGH for A STREETCAR NAMED DESIRE
4. KATHARINE HEPBURN for THE AFRICAN QUEEN
5. MOIRA SHEARER for THE TALES OF HOFFMANN
1952
1. JEAN SIMMONS for ANGEL FACE
2. JENNIFER JONES for CARRIE
3. INGRID BERGMAN for EUROPA '51
4. SHIRLEY BOOTH for COME BACK, LITTLE SHEBA
5. DEBBIE REYNOLDS for SINGIN' IN THE RAIN
1953
1. DANIELLE DARRIEUX for THE EARRINGS OF MADAME DE...
2. DEBORAH KERR for FROM HERE TO ETERNITY
3. LESLIE CARON for LILI
4. AUDREY HEPBURN for ROMAN HOLIDAY
5. MAGGIE MCNAMARA for THE MOON IS BLUE
1954
1. JUDY GARLAND for A STAR IS BORN
2. GRACE KELLY for THE COUNTRY GIRL
3. GRACE KELLY for REAR WINDOW
4. AUDREY HEPBURN for SABRINA
5. GIULETTA MASINA for LA STRADA
1955
1. SUSAN HAYWARD for I'LL CRY TOMORROW
2. ANNA MAGNANI for THE ROSE TATTOO
3. JANE WYMAN for ALL THAT HEAVEN ALLOWS
4. JENNIFER JONES for LOVE IS A MANY SPLENDORED THING
5. ELEANOR PARKER for INTERRUPTED MELODY
1956
1. CARROLL BAKER for BABY DOLL
2. INGRID BERGMAN for ANASTASIA
3. LAUREN BACALL for WRITTEN ON THE WIND
4. NANCY KELLY for THE BAD SEED
5. AUDREY HEPBURN for WAR AND PEACE
1957
1. JOANNE WOODWARD for THE THREE FACES OF EVE
2. MARLENE DIETRICH for WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION
3. TATYANA SAMOJLOVA for THE CRANES ARE FLYING
4. GIULETTA MASINA for NIGHTS OF CABIRIA
5. AUDREY HEPBURN for LOVE IN THE AFTERNOON
1958
1. KIM NOVAK for VERTIGO
2. KIM NOVAK for BELL, BOOK, AND, CANDLE
3. JEANNE MOREAU for ELEVATOR TO THE GALLOWS
4. SUSAN HAYWARD for I WANT TO LIVE!
5. DOROTHY MALONE for THE TARNISHED ANGELS
1959
1. SIMONE SIGNORET for ROOM AT THE TOP
2. EMMANUELLE RIVA for HIROSHIMA, MON AMOUR
3. ELIZABETH TAYLOR for SUDDENLY, LAST SUMMER
4. EVA MARIE SAINT for NORTH BY NORTHWEST
5. LANA TURNER for IMITATION OF LIFE
"and so it seems, that you've grown up and over me, these silly things, i like to dwell on"
1950
1. GLORIA SWANSON for SUNSET BLVD.
2. ELEANOR PARKER for CAGED
3. BETTE DAVIS for ALL ABOUT EVE
4. ANNE BAXTER for ALL ABOUT EVE
5. JUDY HOLLIDAY for BORN YESTERDAY
1951
1. ELEANOR PARKER for DETECTIVE STORY
2. SHELLEY WINTERS for A PLACE IN THE SUN
3. VIVIEN LEIGH for A STREETCAR NAMED DESIRE
4. KATHARINE HEPBURN for THE AFRICAN QUEEN
5. MOIRA SHEARER for THE TALES OF HOFFMANN
1952
1. JEAN SIMMONS for ANGEL FACE
2. JENNIFER JONES for CARRIE
3. INGRID BERGMAN for EUROPA '51
4. SHIRLEY BOOTH for COME BACK, LITTLE SHEBA
5. DEBBIE REYNOLDS for SINGIN' IN THE RAIN
1953
1. DANIELLE DARRIEUX for THE EARRINGS OF MADAME DE...
2. DEBORAH KERR for FROM HERE TO ETERNITY
3. LESLIE CARON for LILI
4. AUDREY HEPBURN for ROMAN HOLIDAY
5. MAGGIE MCNAMARA for THE MOON IS BLUE
1954
1. JUDY GARLAND for A STAR IS BORN
2. GRACE KELLY for THE COUNTRY GIRL
3. GRACE KELLY for REAR WINDOW
4. AUDREY HEPBURN for SABRINA
5. GIULETTA MASINA for LA STRADA
1955
1. SUSAN HAYWARD for I'LL CRY TOMORROW
2. ANNA MAGNANI for THE ROSE TATTOO
3. JANE WYMAN for ALL THAT HEAVEN ALLOWS
4. JENNIFER JONES for LOVE IS A MANY SPLENDORED THING
5. ELEANOR PARKER for INTERRUPTED MELODY
1956
1. CARROLL BAKER for BABY DOLL
2. INGRID BERGMAN for ANASTASIA
3. LAUREN BACALL for WRITTEN ON THE WIND
4. NANCY KELLY for THE BAD SEED
5. AUDREY HEPBURN for WAR AND PEACE
1957
1. JOANNE WOODWARD for THE THREE FACES OF EVE
2. MARLENE DIETRICH for WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION
3. TATYANA SAMOJLOVA for THE CRANES ARE FLYING
4. GIULETTA MASINA for NIGHTS OF CABIRIA
5. AUDREY HEPBURN for LOVE IN THE AFTERNOON
1958
1. KIM NOVAK for VERTIGO
2. KIM NOVAK for BELL, BOOK, AND, CANDLE
3. JEANNE MOREAU for ELEVATOR TO THE GALLOWS
4. SUSAN HAYWARD for I WANT TO LIVE!
5. DOROTHY MALONE for THE TARNISHED ANGELS
1959
1. SIMONE SIGNORET for ROOM AT THE TOP
2. EMMANUELLE RIVA for HIROSHIMA, MON AMOUR
3. ELIZABETH TAYLOR for SUDDENLY, LAST SUMMER
4. EVA MARIE SAINT for NORTH BY NORTHWEST
5. LANA TURNER for IMITATION OF LIFE
"and so it seems, that you've grown up and over me, these silly things, i like to dwell on"
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Friday, May 29, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
